2009/4/11 mabshoff <michael.absh...@mathematik.uni-dortmund.de>: > > > > On Apr 10, 8:13 pm, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> I've added support as per Mariah's recommendation in trunk. It only >> supports ABI=64 not n32 so I've changed that to the first one tried >> for that arch. I had to edit acinclude.m4 to make sure it excluded >> pathcc from the list of compilers it tested to see if it was a gcc >> compiler, otherwise it just used gcc optimisation flags and ignored >> the pathcc ones. I don't really see why that is ever considered a >> feature. > > Cool. > >> Anyhow, make and make check now work fine on cato with pathcc. > > Are the default flags still not using optimization?
I don't understand the question. If gcc is used, it uses optimisation -O2. If pathscale is used it is set to -O0. That works. Bill. > >> Bill. > > Cheers, > > Michael > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
