On Saturday 11 April 2009 22:21:04 mabshoff wrote:
> Opps,
>
> this OSX 10.4 specific issues slipped through my testing so far. The
> bug itself is generally present on OSX, but only leads to linking
> failures on OSX 10.4.
>
> g++ -dynamiclib ${wl}-undefined ${wl}dynamic_lookup -o .libs/
> liblinboxsage.0.0.0.dylib .libs/linbox-sage.o -L/Users/Roed/Math/
> sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib -lntl /Users/Roed/Math/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/
> lib/libgmpxx.dylib /Users/Roed/Math/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/
> libmpir.dylib /Users/Roed/Math/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/libgmp.dylib /
> Users/Roed/Math/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/libgivaro.dylib -L/Users/Roed/
> Math/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local//lib -install_name /Users/Roed/Math/
> sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/liblinboxsage.0.dylib -compatibility_version
> 1 -current_version 1.0 -Wl,-single_module
> ld: multiple definitions of symbol ___gmpz_clear
> /Users/Roed/Math/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/libmpir.dylib(clear.o)
> definition of ___gmpz_clear
> /Users/Roed/Math/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/libgmp.dylib(clear.o)
> definition of ___gmpz_clear
> <SNIP various other symbols>
> ld: multiple definitions of symbol ___gmpz_sizeinbase
> /Users/Roed/Math/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/libmpir.dylib(sizeinbase.o)
> definition of ___gmpz_sizeinbase
> /Users/Roed/Math/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/libgmp.dylib(sizeinbase.o)
> definition of ___gmpz_sizeinbase
> /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin8/4.0.1/libtool: internal link edit
> command failed
> make[4]: *** [liblinboxsage.la] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
> Error installing linbox
>
> The problem lies in libgmpxx.la:
>
> # Libraries that this one depends upon.
> dependency_libs=' /tmp/mpr-1.0/lib/libmpir.la'
>
> Because there is libmpir.la instead of libgmp.la linbox links with
>
> -lgmpxx -mpir -lgmp
>
> and things blow up as above. The manual workaround to make libgmpxx.la
> depend on libgmp.la fixes the build.
>
but then we get the problem , that it takes two go's to install it as
before , as it wont install until it's dependences "are in".
We could go back to sym-links , although would this have the same problem as
above?
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
