On Saturday 28 May 2011 18:46:46 Jason wrote:
> On Saturday 28 May 2011 17:12:12 Jason wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 May 2011 11:36:56 Jason wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > on gcc70 which is a netburstlahf running 64bit netbsd with gcc-4.1.3 we
> > > get this error
> > >
> > > PASS: t-get_d
> > > PASS: t-get_d_2exp
> > > PASS: t-get_si
> > > PASS: t-get_sx
> > > [1] Abort trap (core dumped) "${tst}" >t-get_...
> > > FAIL: t-get_ux
> > > PASS: t-hamdist
> > > PASS: t-import
> > > PASS: t-inp_str
> > > PASS: t-io_raw
> > > PASS: t-jac
> > > PASS: t-lcm
> > > PASS: t-likely_prime_p
> > >
> > >
> > > we do get these warning when building the tests
> > >
> > >
> > > ibtool: link: cc -std=gnu99 -O2 -m64 -march=nocona -mtune=nocona -o
> > > .libs/t- get_si t-get_si.o ../../tests/.libs/libtests.a
> > > /home/jasonmoxham/gcc70.fsffrance.org.06942a/gcc70.fsffrance.org.17184a
> > > /m pi rbld/.libs/libmpir.so ../../.libs/libmpir.so -Wl,-rpath
> > > -Wl,/home/jason
> > > moxham/gcc70.fsffrance.org.06942a/gcc70.fsffrance.org.17184a/install/li
> > > b cc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests/mpz
> > > -I../.. - I../../../../mpir-2.4.0 -I../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests
> > > -O2 -m64 - march=nocona -mtune=nocona -c
> > > ../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests/mpz/t-get_sx.c
> > > ../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests/mpz/t-get_sx.c: In function 'check_data':
> > > ../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests/mpz/t-get_sx.c:63: warning: implicit
> > > declaration of function 'mpz_get_sx'
> > > ../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests/mpz/t-get_sx.c: In function 'check_max':
> > > ../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests/mpz/t-get_sx.c:102: warning: implicit
> > > declaration of function 'mpz_set_sx'
> > > /bin/ksh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -std=gnu99 -O2 -m64
> > > - march=nocona -mtune=nocona -o t-get_sx t-get_sx.o
> > > ../../tests/libtests.la ../../libmpir.la
> > > libtool: link: cc -std=gnu99 -O2 -m64 -march=nocona -mtune=nocona -o
> > > .libs/t- get_sx t-get_sx.o ../../tests/.libs/libtests.a
> > > /home/jasonmoxham/gcc70.fsffrance.org.06942a/gcc70.fsffrance.org.17184a
> > > /m pi rbld/.libs/libmpir.so ../../.libs/libmpir.so -Wl,-rpath
> > > -Wl,/home/jason
> > > moxham/gcc70.fsffrance.org.06942a/gcc70.fsffrance.org.17184a/install/li
> > > b cc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests/mpz
> > > -I../.. - I../../../../mpir-2.4.0 -I../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests
> > > -O2 -m64 - march=nocona -mtune=nocona -c
> > > ../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests/mpz/t-get_ux.c
> > > ../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests/mpz/t-get_ux.c: In function 'check_data':
> > > ../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests/mpz/t-get_ux.c:64: warning: implicit
> > > declaration of function 'mpz_set_ux'
> > > ../../../../mpir-2.4.0/tests/mpz/t-get_ux.c:65: warning: implicit
> > > declaration of function 'mpz_get_ux'
> > > /bin/ksh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -std=gnu99 -O2 -m64
> > > - march=nocona -mtune=nocona -o t-get_ux t-get_ux.o
> > > ../../tests/libtests.la ../../libmpir.la
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > the log is
> > >
> > > -bash-4.1$ cat t-get_ux.log
> > > FAIL: t-get_ux (exit: 134)
> > > ==========================
> > > mpz_get_ux() failed for data on item 8
> > >
> > >
> > > Jason
> >
> > I think the error is that while t-get_sx.c has the constants postfixed by
> > an "L" in the t-get_ux.c we dont. However the constants go up to 64bit so
> > an L would break windows . What we need is the postfix for an intmax_t ,
> > I think we can use CNST_LIMB(0xfffffffff...) as it should be an L on
> > unix and LL on windows
> >
> > Jason
>
my dinner was burning , looking at the code
> look at the code I dont see what you trying to do
>
>
> mpz_set_ux(z, val[i]);
> n = mpz_get_ux(z);
> #if NLIMBS == 1
> if(n && n != z->_mp_d[k++]) // THIS SHOULD BE 0 NOT k++
> ??????????? {
>
> and
>
>
> if(z->_mp_size != k) // THIS SHOULD BE 1 NOT k ??????????????????
> {
> printf("mpz_get_ux() failed for length on item %d (mpz size:
> %d, size: %d)\n", i, z->_mp_size, k);
> abort();
> }
> if(z->_mp_alloc < k) // THIS SHOULD BE 1 NOT K ??????????????
> {
> printf("mpz_get_ux() failed for allocation on item %d (mpz
> alloc: %d, size: %d)\n", i, z->_mp_alloc, k);
> abort();
> }
>
>
>
> I cant see how this passed on any other machine ??
> Jason
it looks like the ifdef I put in for VS2008 uintmax_t are wrong well
Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
