On Sunday 19 June 2011 23:54:39 Bill Hart wrote:
> Looks promising.
> 
> I've started working on FFT's again. So maybe this MPIR release will
> have some new multiplication speedups at last!
> 

I'm hoping to do some division stuff as well  , but of course time is the 
problem.


> Bill.
> 
> On 19 June 2011 23:24, Jason <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote:
> >> 24) New Toom22 code , the new code is smaller if we let the high part
> >> 
> >> >= low part which is the opposite of the current code , so it's
> >> 
> >> probably easier just to rewrite the whole thing.
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > Here is a outline of the new toom22_n code , there are obvious O(1)
> > speedups to do , but I'll leave them until I've tested the new assembler
> > code as the linear part O(n) is what has improved . I rewrote all the
> > code as that was the easiest way as there are other slight minor
> > differences(and I do so hate reading other's code). The original code
> > has the differences between high an low parts and this has not changed ,
> > what has changed is the last section where we add/sub the sub-products
> > together to form the desired full product. Originally this consisted of
> > three add's which on the K8 run at 4.5 cycles per word , this was
> > improved with the new mpn_addadd_n function which ran at 3.5 cycles per
> > word and now I have a new mpn_karaadd(ie mpn_addaddadd) function which
> > runs at 2.5 cycles a word. The addadd function gave us 2-7% speedup and
> > I pretty much expect the same again.The lower bound is actually 2.0
> > cycles a word and I think I may be able to get it without too much pipe
> > lining. Similar improvements are possible on the Intel cpu's and many
> > others( the RISC cpu's are probably easier). I've only writen the inner
> > loop of addaddadd function so far but I dont for-see any difficulties ,
> > should be able to finish it it next week.In case you are wondering the
> > new asm code wont be general code like the mpn_addadd_n was but will be
> > specific for toom22 multiplication as it has to cope with operand
> > overlap and the "odd" cases.
> > 
> > 
> > Jason
> > 
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to
> > mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email
> > to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this
> > group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to