Oh sorry, I'm confused. Obviously trunc <= n is valid. What we need though is the entire call trace that leads to that set of params so we can see where the bug is. I am sure the bug is in my code, I'm just not sure where.
Bill. On Tuesday, 3 January 2012, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Brian, > > yes n=1, trunc=0 is an invalid set of params. > > We must have trunc > n. So we need to track down where it is called from to see how it's happening. > > Bill. > > On Tuesday, 3 January 2012, Cactus <rieman...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The twiddle code is entered with n = 0 from the above sequence both when n = 1 and also when trunk = 0 and n = 0. >> Brian >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mpir-devel/-/U7M2dMhUOoAJ. >> To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
