-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Hart
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 4:16 PM
To: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] Possible Issue with the Windows command lIne
build?
I don't know very much about the command line build. But I am not
really in favour of option 1.
I don't see why option 3 is a problem. However, it depends. Is the cfg
file different per architecture? Would it automatically find the right
one if they were all there in their respective directories?
====================
The problem is just the overhead of producing them and keeping them up to
date.
They are generated automatically by the Visual Studio build generator so
someone has to build every possible architecture variation to set up all of
them.
The Visual Studio build in MPIR is now very different to that supplied
earlier. Apart from a small number of pre-configured builds, a user now has
to run a Python program and select the architecture for which they wish to
build. This then produces a number of files needed for building with Visual
Studio, after which MPIR for the selected architecture can be built using
the Visual Studio IDE. The necessary cfg.h files are built as a part of
this process.
I can do this and add them if we want to adopt this solution but it means in
effect that I end up partly supporting the command line build, a task that I
am not really keen to take on. However, I can do it as a 'one off'
provided I am not then committed to provide on-going support for it.
Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
