On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 03:46:38PM +0100, Ivo wrote: > On Thursday 29 November 2007 13:07, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 02:52:59AM -0500, Rich Felker wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:02:42PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote: > > > > I did not check every one of the 1100+ source files, but I did check > > > > a bunch of them, and they also said GPLv2 or later, not GPLv2-only > > > > (happily, from my perspective). > > > > > > > > So, assuming it really is GPLv2 or later, could info.html be updated > > > > to match? > > > > > > I suspect there is at least one piece of v2-only code somewhere in > > > MPlayer, but this is an issue that really requires some research to > > > resolve. If you'd like to dig thru all the files and publish your > > > results, I'm sure it would be helpful to someone or other. > > > > It would be most helpful, yes. > > > > Off the top of my head I remember that libaf/af_lavcresample.c and > > libaf/af_sweep.c have the following at the top of the file: > > > > // #inlcude <GPL_v2.h> > > > > This is suboptimal of course. We'll have to convince Michael to replace > > that with a proper license header. > > I remembered some of the code I contributed was strictly v2. I just went > over all the code I maintain and added proper license headers, copyright > notices and also relicensed my code under v2+. I do not really care about > strict v2 anymore, as long as the code stays free as in speech.
Thanks a lot. Diego _______________________________________________ MPlayer-DOCS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-docs
