In a message dated 10/23/2000 8:11:36 PM Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards the following on behalf of Wally Swan:

<< In answer to the statement in the Star Tribune that adding debt load from
 the Library Referendum would not have an effect upon the city bond rating:
 
 According to Standard and Poor's (January 2000), the average net debt per
 capita for 32 AAA rated cities is $1,750, although some latitude is granted
 based upon the other major factors that go into making up a bond rating
 (e.g. larger cities may have a bit more debt based upon other major rating
 factors such as administration, economy and finances, with an average of
 $1,883 per capita for larger communities). The direct indebtedness per
 capita for general obligation bonding in Minneapolis will be $2,948.34 (for
 all year 2000 sales as of December 31, 2000). Neither the use of debt
 scheduling (adding segments of the $140 million Library Referendum over a
 multi-year period to the aggregate debt of $1,131,118,438 as of the end of
 year 2000) nor the designation of the $140 million Library Referendum as
 "infrastructure" will prevent insightful rating agencies from looking at
 their usual ratios and numbers regarding per capita level of debt and the
 aggregate total of debt  >>


I find Wally Swan's post referencing S&P avg. net debt per capita for 32 AAA 
rated cities very interesting.  His point is well taken.  However, I'd be 
interested in seeing such data for cities with a population the size of 
Minneapolis ( say within +/- 20 percent of our population) for a better 
comparison.  I'd also be interested in relevant details/insight concerning 
other major rating factors (i.e. strength of local/regional economy, 
diversity of local economy, commercial vacancy trends, operating revenue 
ratios,etc.) that are also considered when determining a municipal bond 
rating.  I always want to be sure I'm comparing apples with apples and 
oranges with oranges.  I think it only fair that the City, maybe the acting 
Finance Director, have an opportunity to respond to Mr. Swan's posted data 
and shed some added insight on the situation.  Any municipal bond analysts in 
the audience?  Thanks in advance.

M. Hohmann
13th Ward


Reply via email to