> It was suggested that the invitation to leave a message would allow
> these automated messages. Rich Chandler suggested that he might put
> a message saying that no solicitations were wanted...
>
> I very strongly doubt that whatever is driving these automated systems
> has the capability of interpreting what is said in the the message that
> answers the call, so it wouldn't make any difference what the message says.
Preventing them from leaving a message is not the point. The point is
that they are then not invited to leave a message which theoretically
removes the argument that you invited them to leave a message.
Theoretically giving you legal grounds for either charging them for the
use of your private answering machine or filing harrassment charges
against them.
The machines do have the cabability of detecting the word "Hello". Many
of them start after you say "hello". It is possible that they are waiting
for any voice and not just the word hello.
Rich McMartin
Bryant.
