First off, the Hennepin County Attorney's Office, not the City of
Minneapolis Attorney's Office will be prosecuting these cases.

Second off, the County Attorney has 160 attorneys, and over 400 staff total
and it is doubtful that these few cases would cause any overtime or other
things sliding.

Third off, this article does not provide any information as to why these
cases are being brought back. There are good legal reasons that they could
be brought back.  Does anyone have information on why this is?

Carol Becker
Longfellow


----- Original Message -----
From: Rosalind Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2000 12:51 PM
Subject: Re-charging of ISAG cases


> According to the Independent Media website (www.minneapolis.indymedia.org)
> the city is re-charging ISAG protesters whose cases had been dismissed in
> November (apparently the ones that were dropped by the judge because of
"no
> probable cause").  So are they hoping for a different judge?  Trying to
> make extra work for the protester's lawyers?
>
> It seems as though the City Attorney's office must have some
> responsibilities other than conducting a war of attrition with protest
> groups.  So are they hiring extra staff, working lots of overtime, or
> letting their other normal duties slide?
>
> Rosalind Nelson
> Bancroft
>

Reply via email to