I think it is quite arguable that the larger 5.3 acre park, without JADT, could actually cause 'more' nearby redevelopment in the long term, than the smaller 3.4 acre park with JADT. Dave Stack, Harrison
> On Nov 26 Keith Reitman wrote : >> ... river front types and naturalists should support the JADT development proposal for many new housing units and a big park at the Riverview site. It will guarantee a new group of stake holders, hard-wired for a clean, safe and quiet river front. These new home owners on the river will be present to monitor conditions and speak with a clear voice. The best outcomes for the river will be the best outcomes for these new stakeholders. Think about it. ... >> _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
