This is the paragraph that I don't understand: "Marriott says Graves, in order to extricate his group from the 20-year agreement, sued first, accusing Marriott of "duping" Graves into signing the agreement based on misrepresentations about the target customers of the "Renaissance brand.""
Please tell me how "a veteran hotel developer...(who) operates numerous hotel properties, including Marriott" can be duped by what the target market of a partner is. This argument just doesn't seem plausible to me and I have to believe there is something deeper going on here. I sure hope another downtown development fiasco is not on the horizon. R u s s e l l W. P e t e r s o n Saint Michael, Minnesota [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________ "You can only fly if you stretch your wings." _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
