At 8:40 AM -0800 11/5/02, Jim Mork wrote about his experience at the polls, where there was a long line that moved slowly:

First,  the voting
machine was breaking down.  Which was a first for
me in this precinct since we went to this kind of
counting in the Joan Growe years.
Our precinct had new machines. Though this seemed to be working correctly, perhaps yours was not. Problems do happen with electronic vote counting.

 Second, they
had one elderly lady handing out the ballots,
explaining how the senatorial vote was to be
handled,AND writing sequential numbers on the
receipts.  She was complaining that she couldn't
keep up with the writing and she tried to do
several while I stood there waiting for my
ballot.
This is the job of the one of the judges, yes. Hand out the ballot, describe what to do, collect and number the receipts. The judges switch positions throughout the day.

She seemed to feel she had to put them on a spike
as she wrote the numbers on them.
She is required to.

She tried to
push several at once on the spike,  but she
hadn't the hand strength to do it.
She tried to get caught up, and should have done them one by one.

Then she found
a numbered receipt that hadn't been put on where
it belonged in the numerical order.  I can't tell
if this was her own invented procedure, but it
certainly was a bottle neck in the whole thing.
That's not her own invented procedure. The receipts are numbered so that the used receipts can be tallied against the number of ballots counted. This procedure helps detect if ballots were counted that were not cast by registered voters (since the receipt is given to those on the voter rolls when they sign in, or register).

Plus, the had about a half dozen people younger
and stronger than she was.
She'll be rotated to a different job as the day goes on.

This whole voting procedure was full of novelties
with no advance notice.
I didn't notice any thing new except the new grey ballot counters. The old ones were blue.

 As a result, newcomers
came in and stood in the long line for a while
before someone told them they had to have a
receipt.
Voters have been required to pick up a receipt when they sign in and to then turn in the receipt when they collect their ballot in Minneapolis for many many years now. This is not a new procedure.

Most got disgruntled but went ahead and
voted anyway.  One old guy came in with a cane
and said there was no way he could stand that
long in a line.
There are procedures for aiding handicapped voters, including procedures to allow voting by voters who cannot walk or leave the car that brought them to the polls. I am sorry he didn't ask for a chair, and that one was not offered to him.

One discouraged vote gone this
year.  I don't know how many went away mmediately
on seeing the line. One could criticize their
attitude, but the thing to remember is that
in the Cooper neighborhood, we don't HAVE this
kind of experience with voting. Prior to this
year, we had admirable efficiency. The problem
had to be an imposed one because the same judges
do it every time.  Wellstone's death made a
problem, but it didn't cause all this.
I saw nothing unusual or new in any procedure at my polling place.

A number of ballots in this precinct did NOT get
electronically counted. People had waited 45
minutes to make the critical step, and then the
machine wouldnt work (can you say "Florida"?)
I swore that once I marked my ballot, I'd wait
all day to get it machine-counted.  I'm not that
old yet, and I arranged a day off for the
election because I kinda smelled trouble coming.
I didn't want to worry about getting to work in
this kind of year.
I am speaking from experience in my remarks above. For years I was an election judge at Painter Park (then 10-5; it's something else now). The gubernatorial race where Arnie Carlson replaced Jon Grunseth at the last minute was a nightmare. We hand counted ballots that year, but we also machine counted, and the voting machines had some problem where static electricity built up and caused the computer in the machine to loses its memory. We re-counted, the memory would zero, we recounted, the memory would zero, on and on into the night. Around 4 am, we took the ballots to City Hall where another judge and I (one from each party) fed them into machine on a rubber mat which had been sprayed with Static Guard. Our precinct had an accurate vote count, but it took us 24 hours to produce it. I have a Commendation from Mayor Sayles-Belton for my work that night. I am quite proud of it.

Minnesota leads the nation in accurate fair elections. The ballots will be counted by a working tally machine. One way or another.

I genuinely believe there WILL be some lawsuits
on this election day.  I hope so.  I think there
is fishy stuff going on.
From what you've reported, it doesn't sound like it to me. It sounds like a high voter turnout combined with an elderly, slow-moving judge. Perhaps you can consider working an election yourself some day; it's quite an interesting experience.

A note to those who are reporting their precinct turnouts: the ballot counting machine I inserted my two pages of ballot into counted *each page as a separate voter*. If you are reporting turnouts based on the number presented on the voting machine, it seems to me you have to divide that number by 2.

Karen Cooper, wearing an "I voted" sticker in Tangletown
_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@;mnforum.org
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to