I find it amazing that some people think that  appointing a superintendent with no background in education is okay to do with a minimal amount of public discussion.   Some members of the African American community are upset -- we should all be upset.  This is a huge change and should be done only with serious input from, at a minimum,  parents and teachers.  What's the rush?  Jennings was going to be the interim superintendent already.  And how is it that we appoint someone without seeing who else is out there who wants the job?  I can't help but think that if the board had appointed an African American or other person of color without an education background that there would be an uproar with charges of favoritism based on race [social construct or not].  And as far as the argument goes about running the schools as a business -- that's a laugh.  Seward -- where my son went for 9 years -- had 1 copier that collated documents for 700+ students, 34 teachers and other staff.  Paper was rationed.  What business could operate that way?    I don't know whether Jennings is a good choice or a bad choice -- I don't know how important it is to have a superintendent with a PhD in education, but I do know that if we are going to make that kind of change, we owe it to our kids to make it thoughtfully. 
 
Diane Wiley -- recently moved from Powderhorn to what is called, I think, East Harriet -- I'm still not sure....

Reply via email to