This is not the same as "clearing" Jindra or showing the allegations to be false. This simply says that the Civil Rights Division, Criminal Section of the USDOJ (of which the FBI is the investigatory arm) did not find enough to make the case prosecutable under the particular federal civil rights statutes they prosecute under (the ones the Feds used in the Rodney King case).

We've done some research on prosecutions under this set of statutes, including speaking with attorneys in the department about their guidelines, and the standards for prosecution are pretty high. Most "run of the mill" police brutality cases would have difficulty meeting these standards. One of the standards, for example, is that the case has to have national significance. The DOJ seems to only take on a limited number of these cases a year. As appalling as the case involving Titi's son is, it probably was not able to rise to the "national significance" standard.

For more information on this section of the DOJ see http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/crim/crimhome.html
The information on the kinds of cases they handle is fascinating.


Michelle Gross
Bryn Mawr

At 07:53 AM 10/16/03 -0700, Mark Wilde wrote:
"Sources told WCCO Officer Jindra recently received a
letter from the FBI saying it had finished
investigating allegations against Jindra and concluded
that "evidence does not establish a prosecutable
violation of the federal criminal civil rights
statutes."

(snip)


Allegations are often proven false.  Sometimes they do
turn out to be true, and if so, the officers should be
punished appropriately, but sometime they are not
true.

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
________________________________


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to