Mark Anderson:
Well it's generally political skills, not management skills that results in 
promotions.  In any case, I'm talking about a higher level of management skills 
than a even a good mid-level manager has.  It's far from an easy task to 
change the culture of a big city police force, or else any candidate could do 
it.<<<
*snip*
Thanks Eva.  Most of Jonathan's comments have been very reasonable, but he 
was overreaching here.  Both of our comments are very subjective, because the 
evidence is so slim.  The lack of evidence is my main point.  I am concerned 
about McManus much more because we don't know what could do than that a few cops 
in Dayton don't like him.<<

Actually, Mark , no.  My opinion that he is the best choice for the job, may 
be subjective but the lack of evidence to support your claim that he has 
alienated the street cops is pretty empirical.  If you wish to make an assertion 
and for it to have merit, you need to provide some evidence or support and 
neither of you have yet to be able to do that.  Thus, if you" "re really concerned 
about this alleged âlack of evidenceâ, Iâd suggest doing a bit of research 
to convince yourself definitively either way.  But making subjective statements 
as if they were fact with no support is disingenuous in my opinion.
 
And Iâm not sure what exactly youâre looking for in terms of evidence, but I 
listed a plethora of stats and accomplishments, but you still claim "lack of 
evidence". Yet it seems evidence enough for me, the selection committee and a 
host of community groups, citizens and elected officials that are supporting 
McManus.  So what exactly and specifically are you looking for in terms of 
evidence? For a lot of people the evidence is apparent.  Some people, however, 
will never think itâs enough no matter what and that ends the possibility of 
discussion or honest examination.  So if you have some idea of what youâre looking 
for, put it out in case someone already knows, or research Dayton and DC, if 
only for your own piece of mind on it.
 
As you talk about management vs. political, it becomes a double-edged sword.  
As you make statements to the effect of promotions being political, you also 
eliminate the validity of Gerold and Lubinskiâs promotions and rank, thus 
negating arguments from people claiming they are just as qualified and they should 
be chosen over McManus. And then we're left with only experience, which 
McManus has more of. As you ask the question of management ability, again, please 
clarify what youâre looking for.  You cited your experience in medium and large 
size companies, and as such you should know that no matter how much a 
promotion is political, you donât keep it or get to stay with a company if youâre 
not effective or your division is not producing.  Itâs fine to ask for evidence 
of being an effective manager, but claiming that one isnât because you havenâ
t research evidence or you donât like what is presented to you is speculative 
and inaccurate.  The simple fact of holding a Deputy/Assistant Chief position 
and then getting recruited for two Chief positions (three if you want to count 
Seattle) outside of his city (DC and now Dayton) is a pretty good indicator 
of him being an effective manager.  Why would a department want someone who was 
ineffective?
 
All the stuff I listed says effective to me.  That may be subjective and my 
opinion, but then in that vein most of life is in those regards.  But everytime 
I hear a new story it further reiterates this.  Natalie Johnson-Lee saw his 
effectiveness in DC during the WTO protests.  McManus described part of the 
situation being that a squad showed up minus badges and name tags and he made 
them go back in a put them on.  Management, effective appropriate decision making 
and follow through by those under his command.  And thereâs plenty more 
examples like this.  So what are you looking for to say that he is or isnât 
effective?  What is your criteria?  Minus that you can simply say subjectively 
âitâs 
not enoughâ all day and there is no conclusion, but thatâs not objectively 
trying to discern if he is or isnât the right person for the job, and thatâs 
whatâs most important right now.

Jonathan Palmer
Victory
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to