http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/4349498.html

The school system serves the needs of some students very well, but is failing 
the large majority. I agree with Jennings on that point. I also agree that 
the problem is systemic. However, in my view, Jennings is blind to the mistakes 
that have been made, and could be corrected by the board and school 
administration. For example, a lot of money has been spent on an attendance policy 
which 
reportedly boosted average test scores, but the boost in test scores appears 
to be more an effect of pushing out the poor performing students than 
improving the performance of poor performing students, which in turn contributed to a 
decline in enrollment and revenues. On the other hand, funding was cut, not 
increased for the Arts for Academic Achievement program, which helped to close 
the learning gap to a significant degree without doing harm to the high 
performing students, and certainly without contributing to a decline in enrollment 
and loss of revenue.

The board went forward with a class size reduction program in the early 
1990s, and ignored concerns raised by the NAACP that inexperienced teachers would 
be concentrated in some schools unless the board worked out an agreement with 
the teachers union to fill the new positions with new teachers instead of 
simply creating a huge number of opportunities for teachers to bid into and out of 
schools. In my opinion, the widening of the academic achievement gap in the 
Minneapolis Public Schools during the early 1990s was due in large part to the 
segregation of new teachers in schools serving poor neighborhoods (and the 
restructuring of the curriculum for the children in those schools).

When school reform after school reform makes a quality education less and 
less accessible to a majority of students, you have to consider the possibility 
that the education reformers and their principle financial backers are actually 
trying to widen, and not close the academic achievement gap.  Jennings 
represents a constituency (employers / chamber of commerce) that benefits from the 
kind of stratified educational system that we now have in Minneapolis: An 
educational system that mirrors and reinforces a class and color-based caste system 
which benefits that filthy rich most of all. 

-Doug Mann, King Field
http://educationright.tripod.com
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to