Federal Judge Jack Tunheim throws out lawsuit against the city's redistricting lines (scheduled to go into effect next year). This is not the Phyllis Kahn suit asking for early elections, but the so-called "Natalie Johnson Lee, et. al." case about whether the new districts were drawn fairly.

It's a 37-page decision. Here's an excerpt:

������� "The plaintiffs have raised important issues in their challenge to the City of
������� Minneapolis'� 2002 redistricting of City Council wards.� And in recent years, the
������� Court has observed that a considerable number of redistricting plans in other states
������� have been drawn in potentially unfair and bizarre ways.� However, that is not the case
������� in the City of Minneapolis.� After a thorough review of the plan chosen by the
������� Redistricting Commission and careful consideration of the extensive record in
������� this case, the Court can reach only one obvious conclusion:� the City's plan
������� passes all legal and constitutional tests and as such it is a plan well done.
������� That other parties or interests, or even the Court for that matter, may have chosen a
������� different plan is immaterial.� The plaintiffs challenge fails."


David Brauer
List manager

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to