A very good point is made here fo descriptive subject lines. So as the chief
architect here, (did I just hear the sound of breaking glass??) I would say
we start any subject line with MQ or MQSI or MQWF. This would solve the
problem. BUT....(you knew this was comming) being a traffic cop only allows
you the assumption that people will follow the local ordinances if they live
by you. So you stand a chance of getting run over by people from out of
state. My point is that as new people enter the LISTSERV how do you
constantly enforce the SUBJECT rules we impose?
bobbee
>From: Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: How about a separate list for MQSI/WMQI?
>Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:15:39 +0200
>
>In order to determine what you don't want to read you need to have a
>useful subject line. The way things stand right now, there's now clear way
>to determine whether a message is related to a particular product unless
>the author kindly and thoughtfully added it in there. You have to admit,
>some of the subjects we've seen have been rather cryptic and only via
>further investigation into the body of the message does one discover what
>the context of the question is.
>
>My suggestion about separate lists was merely to enforce this more
>descriptive subject line. If there is another way, can someone suggest it.
>What I'm looking for is a fool-proof way of filtering messages into
>appropriate buckets. This one-size-fits-all model doesn't cut it for me...
>
>
>
>
>
>Robert Broderick <robertbroderick
>@HOTMAIL.COM>
>Sent by: MQSeries List <MQSERIES
>25/06/2002 02:25 PM
>Please respond to MQSeries List
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: [MQSERIES] How about a separate list for
>MQSI/WMQI?
>
>
>Lets face it. Many of us are interconnected to MQSI thru MQ, and also
>WorkFlow. MAny of the problems are related. Also being the BIG Websphere
>MQ
>family why would you want to seperate them. I am both MQ and MQSI Cert. I
>prefer to have all those discussions here. It would be a pain to bounce
>back
>an forth between three EMAIL addresses to cover all the discussions. All I
>have to do is click the 'Delete" button for items I don't want to read.
>Really not much of an energy drain for me. And with all the 'F R E E"
>information you get, in todays job market, why would you turn that down.
>Remember, "What makes us smarter makes us richer!!" Only Dave from Wendy's
>got ahead without an education!!
>
> bobbee
>
>
> >From: ANAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: ANAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: How about a separate list for MQSI/WMQI?
> >Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 14:14:25 +0530
> >
> >Yup,
> > I with Mike.....There should really be separate list for SI and
> >Workflow.
> > Regards,
> >Anand Jammi
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Mike Kelly
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:45 PM
> > Subject: How about a separate list for MQSI/WMQI?
> >
> >
> >
> > It would benefit me a lot to have the MQ list of questions/issues
> >separated from SI and WorkFlow. Does anyone else agree? Who would we need
> >to speak to? What was the reason for only maintaining one list?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mike
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
>Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
>the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
>Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
>
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
