Absolutely!! Thanks for the correction Paul. What was
I thinking when I was typing (apparently not the issue
at hand...I guess ;-)

Ruzi
--- Paul Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> If no heartbeat packets are received within the
> >> Heartbeat check interval the
> >> receiver will assume an outage and go "Inactive".
>
> >How is this possible? Maybe it is an enhancement in
> >5.3???  Although it is not explicitly mentioned in
> >your info-clip, maybe the Keepalive option is used
> >here???
>
> >Regards
> >Ruzi
>
> As I said in my previous notes the Distributed
> products will issue a
> receive with a timeout if heartbeat is active. If
> we're heartbeating every
> 5 minutes we will issue a receive timeout for 6
> minutes. If the receive
> does actually timeout it means we received neither a
> heartbeat or a message
> in 6 minutes which implies a network failure.
>
> For those who are interested we actually do this
> using a select() call on
> all the Unixes and using SO_RCVTIMEO on Windows.
>
> This is not an enhancement for 5.3 we've done this
> for years and years.
>
> Cheers,
> P.
>
> Paul G Clarke
> WebSphere MQ Development
> IBM Hursley
>
> Instructions for managing your mailing list
> subscription are provided in
> the Listserv General Users Guide available at
> http://www.lsoft.com
> Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Reply via email to