Dave,

unless you have a need for transaction response time, i'd suggest leaving
it a batch job.  MVS does a fine job of managing the workload, and if it is
truely batch type work,  WLM & MVS will keep it from getting in the way of
your mission critical cics tasks.

Since your accessing db2 there shouldn't be any problems with database
accesses unless it locks up the database with a lot of updates


glen Larson
Zurich North America


Dave Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@AKH-Wien.AC.AT> on 09/23/2002
01:33:01 PM

Please respond to MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent by:    MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


To:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:

Subject:    CICS vs batch mq



we have a started task running on ZOS 1.3 and it is up 24x7 that pulls
messages off a queue and places the data into DB2

we are in the process of overhaul on this application and a question came
up about going through CICS instead

there is no trigger queue associated to this message queue, the job just
wakes up and reads all that is available

are there any benefits to changing this to run under CICS

Dave Adam
Supervalu Home Office
Project Specialist
(952) 828-4736
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Success is a Journey, not a Destination





******************* PLEASE NOTE *******************
This E-Mail/telefax message and any documents accompanying this
transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is
intended solely for the addressee(s) named above.  If you are not the
intended addressee/recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on the contents of this
E-Mail/telefax information is strictly prohibited and may result in legal
action against you. Please reply to the sender advising of the error in
transmission and immediately delete/destroy the message and any
accompanying documents.  Thank you.

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Reply via email to