So three months ago I made a simple performance test with amqsblst. I
connected two local qmgrs on Win2K and I sent messages in difference
size (10000*1 KB, 10*1 MB) w/ and wo/ SSL.

My observations was next:
- significant slowing on small messages (>50%)
- minimal difference in performance on large messages (<10%)

I was thinking about the reasons:
- firstly, SSL handshake is an overhead, similarly other protocols
(like MCA handshake, TCP, and so on)
- slowing caused by the special environment (2 local queue manager).
In this case same box had been loaded with crypto tasks.


Tibor

----

> KK,

> Not sure if you're looking for W2K performance numbers or not since you
> didn't start the thread with W2K in the subject line.

> I know that there are currently z/OS figures published in the Performance
> Support Pac MP16 on the cost of starting SSL channels and also the cost of
> transmitting data as a cost per K of data. These might be of interest to
> you. I'll see if I can find out about other platforms and will post another
> message later if I find anything published that you can go and look at.

> Cheers
> Morag

> Morag Hughson
> WebSphere MQ for z/OS Development
> Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




>                       "K K"
>                       <hkmqseries@hotma        To:       Morag Hughson/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>                       il.com>                  cc:       "MQSeries List" 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>                                                Subject:  Re:      Re: MQ v5.3 and 
>SSL W2K
>                       09/01/2003 15:01





> I would like to know where there is an performance evaluation on the
> overhead of using SSL on MQV5.3.   Besides, any experience on the usage of
> SSL on MQ (e.g. stability, overhead, concerns etc) in particular on the
> comparison with other MQ encryption tool such as MQSecure or 'Data Secure'.

> KK
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Morag Hughson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:33 PM
> Subject: Re: MQ v5.3 and SSL W2K


>> To echo a few responses already, yes, you can certainly have SSL and
>> non-SSL channel coexisting on the same queue manager since the attributes
>> to use SSL are specified on a per channel basis.
>>
>> However, you cannot configure SSL as optional on a particular channel and
>> have some SSL and some non-SSL connection coming into the *SAME* channel.
>> You will need a separate channel each for SSL and non-SSL. I think the
>> confusion here might be with the SSLCAUTH parameter where you can specify
>> REQUIRED or OPTIONAL to indicate whether you require client
> authentication
>> AS WELL AS server authentication.
>>
>> Hope this clarifies the point.
>> Cheers
>> Morag
>>
>> Morag Hughson
>> WebSphere MQ for z/OS Development
>> Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                       Luc-Michel Demey
>>                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>          To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>                       Sent by: MQSeries        cc:
>>                       List                     Subject:  Re: MQ v5.3 and
> SSL W2K
>>                       <MQSERIES@AKH-WIE
>>                       N.AC.AT>
>>
>>
>>                       08/01/2003 21:32
>>                       Please respond to
>>                       lmd_listmq
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> in one word, yes.
>>
>> SSL is defined at channel level, not at qmgr level
>>
>> You can even configure SSL as "optionnal" for a channel, so SSL and
>> no-SSL partners will be able to connect.
>>
>> Useful in a migrating phase probably.
>>
>> HTH, Luc-Michel.
>>
>>
>> Date sent:              Wed, 8 Jan 2003 13:10:41 -0800
>> Send reply to:          MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> From:                   Nick Dilauro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject:                MQ v5.3 and SSL W2K
>> To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > I have been reviewing the requirements for using SSL with client to
>> server
>> > connections.  From my reading I understand the qmgr must be configured
> to
>> > point to the repository file containing digital certificates.  Then a
>> server
>> > connection channel must be defined with the SSL settings.  My question
> is
>> > whether it is also possible to have non-SSL server connection channels
>> > defined for an SSL configured qmgr.  In other words, could there be
> both
>> > secure server conn and non-secure server conn channels supported by the
>> same
>> > qmgr?
>> >
>> > TIA
>> > Nick
>> >
>> > Nicholas C. DiLauro
>> > MQSeries Administrator
>> > Technical Services
>> > IBM Certified Specialist - MQSeries
>> > IBM Certified Developer - MQSeries
>> >
>> > QRS Corporation
>> > 1400 Marina Way South, MS 231
>> > Richmond, California  94804
>> >
>> > 510 231 6544  Voice
>> > 510 621 6544  Fax
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided
> in
>> > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
>> > Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
>> >
>>
>> Regards,
>> Luc-Michel Demey, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
>> the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
>> Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
>>
>> Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
>> the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
>> Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
>>

> Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
> the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
> Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Reply via email to