Thanks
for this. Very useful.
There's an interesting (to me!) section comparing performance and
CPU costs for IMS transactions using the IMS bridge vs. the IMS Batch
Trigger Monitor, but its very out of date - even in the latest version of the
supportpac (Dec 2002) it refers to MQ v1.1.4 / IMS V4 etc.
Anybody seen any more up to date comparison....or maybe done some
comparison themselves ?
(I'll
ask the IMS list as well)
thanks,
Pete
_____________________________________________________________________ Notice to recipient: The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity. If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America, N.A., London Branch, Banc of America Securities Limited and Banc of America Futures Incorporated are regulated by the Financial Services Authority. _____________________________________________________________________ |
Title: Message
- MQSeries on OS/390 performance tuning Peter Moir
- Re: MQSeries on OS/390 performance tuning Gina McCarthy
- Re: MQSeries on OS/390 performance tuning Bullock, Rebecca (CSC)
- Re: MQSeries on OS/390 performance tuning Beinert, William
- Peter Moir