Gartner say the opposite of this: "Enterprises should look at investing in tools to monitor and manage their application server platform. Tools from suite vendors such as Hewlett-Packard and IBM Tivoli, or from point-product vendors such as Nastel Technologies. Enterprises looking for best-of-breed performance and availability monitoring solutions will not be able to source all of their needs from a single vendor. They will have to integrate different tools from different vendors on their own."
--- Ronald Weinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was suggested to me a long time ago by someone in > the business, that it > made most financial sense to use the same product > you use to monitor the > rest of your mainframe systems to monitor WMQ. > The information contained in this message may be > CONFIDENTIAL and is for the > intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use, > dissemination of the > information, or copying of this message is > prohibited. If you are not the > intended addressee, please notify the sender > immediately and delete this > message. > ________________________________________________________________________ Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
