What should be the typical specs for an AIX system
that would host only MQSeries queue managers (not MQSI
brokers, just multiple queue managers) ?

The number of queue managers initially would be 10 but
would grow ...
(We're thinking of moving our queue managers to a
central system.)



 --- Robert Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: > Yup, Chris indicated he is doing that
curently and I
> have done that in the
> past.
>
>
> >From: "Kulbir S. Thind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Use of multiple brokers/queue managers
> >Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:46:39 +0000
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >We have business and infrastructure reasons as to
> using a single machine
> >and for operational, scalability (i.e. connecting
> scores of applications),
> >availability and performance reasons are planning
> on using multiple
> >brokers on the same machine.  I was concerned when
> I read your comment
> >that you would not create an additional broker on
> the same machine and the
> >comment from Chris suggesting that multiple brokers
> doesn't resolve the
> >hog solution.  We're not looking at creating
> additional brokers on the
> >same machine solely for the purposes of improving
> performance.
> >
> >Are we saying that if you have enough system
> resources you should be able
> >to run multiple brokers/queue managers on a single
> physical machine?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >"Robert Broderick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Sent by: "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >21-Jan-2004 13:59
> >Please respond to "MQSeries List"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >         To:     MQSERIES
> >
> >         cc:
> >         Subject:        Re: Use of multiple
> brokers/queue managers
> >
> >
> >We were just performance testing a tuning a broker
> and we did hear word
> >that
> >you can increase the number of execution grooups to
> whatever number your
> >box
> >can handle with respect to resources AND increase
> the number of threads in
> >each message flow accessing the queue. But were
> told that there is a
> >breakeven point that no matter how many execution
> groups you allocate or
> >threads within the flow you WILL NOT gain a
> performance advantage. As for
> >RTFM you will not find it there. Work for a large
> client and have scores
> >of
> >IBM tech people coming in and out trying to find
> out WHY your broker is
> >behaving badly. They will however give you tons of
> suggestions on tuning
> >DB2
> >(system, tables), MQ (system, messaging
> infrastructure) and MQSI (system,
> >message flows, esql, node configuration). This
> happend to be on OS390.
> >
> >And frankly, if performance is an issue and you
> need to generate another
> >broker on the same box to achieve more work isn't
> that like doubling up
> >the
> >load on your camel because he is so slow from the
> first load you might as
> >well move more goods to ake advantage of the time
> not realizing you are
> >going to slow down the instrument more. I never
> said you would have
> >problems
> >creating additional brokers. I would think if there
> are business reasons
> >or
> >infrastructure reasons for the multi broker
> solution then by all means.
> >Spend the money.
> >
> >Not trying to be snide. just repeating what I had
> heard and what we rolled
> >back from while trying to get the beast up to 50
> TPS from about 2-3. Like
> >all advice...........
> >
> >
> >bee-oh-dubble-bee-dubble-egh
> >
> >
> > >From: "Kulbir S. Thind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: Use of multiple brokers/queue
> managers
> > >Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:25:15 +0000
> > >
> > >If we have a server that is big enough (i.e. 8
> CPU's, etc) why would we
> > >have a problem creating more brokers with their
> own queue managers?  We
> > >were looking at having 3 queue managers with
> brokers all running on this
> > >big machine, what problems could you foresee?
> > >
> > >TIA,
> > >
> > >Kulbir.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> > >|
>     |
> > >|       To:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>             |
> > >|       cc:
>               |
> > >|       Subject:  Re: Use of multiple
> brokers/queue managers       |
> > >|
>     |
> > >
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> > >
> > >Hmm.  Are you referring to execution groups when
> stating engines?  I am a
> > >little, well alot, slow today ;-)  If that is so,
> then it is possible for
> > >each execution group to impact system resources,
> i.e. memory.  I don't
> > >recall reading about a limit on the number of
> execution groups, but then
> > >again I rather have someone tell me to RTM, minus
> the slang.  As for
> > >creating another broker that is an option, but if
> it is on the same
> >server
> > >it actually has not resolved the "hog" situation.
> > >
> > >Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >|---------+----------------------------->
> > >|         |           "Robert Broderick"|
> > >|         |           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
> > >|         |           OTMAIL.COM>       |
> > >|         |           Sent by: "MQSeries|
> > >|         |           List"             |
> > >|         |           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
> > >|         |           .AC.AT>           |
> > >|         |                             |
> > >|         |                             |
> > >|         |           01/20/2004 12:57  |
> > >|         |           PM                |
> > >|         |           Please respond to |
> > >|         |           "MQSeries List"   |
> > >|         |                             |
> > >|---------+----------------------------->
> > >
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> > >|
>     |
> > >|       To:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>             |
> > >|       cc:
>               |
> > >|       Subject:  Re: Use of multiple
> brokers/queue managers       |
> > >|
>     |
> > >
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> > >
> > >
>
=== message truncated ===

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Reply via email to