Hi Ian,
many thanks for the insight. I tested by disabling GET on
SYSTEM.ADMIN.COMMAND.QUEUE, then the command msg stays on this queue, which
confirmed the receiving MCA does successfully put the request into the
command queue. As soon as I enable the GET on this queue, the same number
of msg appear on the deadQ. However, they are all of msg type "request" ,
not reply, as they should be.
But why should the command server not populate the userid field with its
own id when putting a reply?
A few related questions:
* where does the command server put the reply msg to?
(SYSTEM.MQSC.REPLY.QUEUE? )
* Why are commands sent to command server from MQExplorer on NT got
processed and replied correctly?
* Where do these command reply msg go to before being picked up my the
remote MQExplorer?
Rao, I do use DEF on the channel's PUTAUT field.
I must admit I'm more confused now. Any more idea?
thanks,
Ben
"Chan, Ian M"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Puzzled - remote MQSC
commands land in DeadQ
MQSeries List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
en.AC.AT>
04/01/2004 08:38
PM
Please respond
to MQSeries List
Ben,
I set this remote MQSC 2 years ago and I remembered I had the same problem.
If I remembered correctly, it was caused by the reply message using the ID
in the MQMD, which is your XP logon id. If that's not defined to AIX, you
get the NOT_AUTHORIZED error. The MCAUSER specified in your RCVR only
affects the authority for MQ to put to the request command queue.
I ended up by setting a single id across the platforms and grant
appropriate
rights to achieve this.
I am not good in the context security and may be someone have a better
idea.
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Benjamin F. Zhou
Sent: Friday, 2 April 2004 5:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Puzzled - remote MQSC commands land in DeadQ
Hi,
I setup a qmgr NTQM on XP serving as remote admin server, another qmgr
AIXQM on AIX to which I submit MQSC commands. Both MQ5.3, CSD04.
All the channels are defined, and specifically, I set the receving MCAUSER
field on AIX qmgr to 'mqm', which is the same as I did with
SYSTEM.ADMIN.SVRCONN channel on AIX for me to access the qmgr objects from
MQExplorer on NT, which is working fine.
But the mqsc commands I sent to AIXQM all end up in the
SYSTEM.DEAD.LETTER.QUEUE in AIXQM, with reason code NOT_AUTHORIZED. What
puzzles me most is that under context, the userid is still the NT machines'
userid. I tried the same in MO71, the userid in context became
musr_mqadmin, command msg land in DeadQ as well.
I don't see any reason the receiving channel should fail in replacing the
userid field in the msg header with 'mqm'.
Has anyone experienced this? What could I be missing.
thanks,
Ben
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
