|
Sorry for the misleading subject line from my previous post.
Guess it must have been one of those good windows features, autocomplete.
:)
It should have read, Hidden mystery instead.
Cheers
Kumar
-------Original Message-------
From: MQSeries List Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 05:56:49
PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Rebate info... "Bobbee is correct. I have altered the base queue name of an alias
queue
through a MQAI program. I then checked the queue through the
MQExplorer and
it did not show the update. I then used runmqsc to
verify the change and
runmqsc showed the change. Still after a period
of time the MQExplorer did
not show the update."
---This happens
because MQExplorer did *NOT* update any info automatically.
Because
MQExplorer is eventually sending PCF messages to get the latest
info
from the queue manager. Unless you issue refresh, it wont send a
request to
get the latest info and hence you wont see the updated info
within
MQExplorer.
The easy way out is, always refresh the entire queue manager to see
any
changes to any objects that took place.
Cheers
Kumar
John
-----Original Message----- From: Robert Broderick
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 7:05
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Re: Hidden mystery I have seen instances where MQExplorer has reported things in error
but I
don't recall it ever not reporting an object not being there or
being there
when it wasn't. Pauls suggestions are good. BUT!!!!! always
go with runmqsc
to be sure.
bobbee
>From: Paul Clarke < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To:
MQSeries List < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject:
Re: Hidden mystery >Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 11:14:08
+0100 > >Bharath, > >Q1. I'm not aware of the
ability to 'hide' objects from certain users. You >can, of course,
prevent users from using certain objects. > >Q2. I can think
of no way MQ Explorer can define objects that are not know >to the
Solaris machine. I think it far more likely that > >a) You
have actually defined then on a diffeernt machine that you
thought >you had > >or > >b) When looking
for these objects you are not taking into account
case >sensitivity. > > >It would be interesting to
use another remote administrator, say my MO71 >support pac, to see
whether the objects are visible to
it. > >Cheers, >P. > >Paul G
Clarke >WebSphere MQ Development >IBM
Hursley > > > > >|---------+----------------------------> >|
| Bharath Ram | >| | Srinivasan | >| | < [EMAIL PROTECTED]| >| |
ARIS.CO.IN> | >| | Sent by: MQSeries| >| | List | >|
| < [EMAIL PROTECTED]| >| |
N.AC.AT> | >| | | >| | | >| | 25/05/2004 09:14
| >| | Please respond to| >| | MQSeries List
| >|---------+----------------------------> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------| >
| > | > | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > | cc: > | > | Subject: Hidden mystery >
| > | > | > | >
| > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------| > > > > >Folks, > > >
Q1: Is there some way to hide MQ objects (say a queue or channel) for
a >particular set of users? If yes, how? > > >
Q2: > > >Scenario - I am using IBM's MQ Explorer(v
5.2.1) in Windows to >browse/define/modify objects in my Solaris
box. There are some >objects/processes which I created/modified
using MQ Explorer. But I was >perplexed when I ran a display command
for that Process directly in the >Solaris box - "It said that the
object was not found". > > >But the same process kept
working with my application at that time. My >question - Why is the
Solaris box where the MQ is hosted not able to >identify its own
objects? Is the MQ Explore hiding something? > > >Thanks
in advance for your valuable
inputs. > > >Cheers, > > >Bharath > > > > > > > > >####
InterScan_Disclaimer.txt has been removed from this note on May
25 >2004 by Paul Clarke > >Instructions for managing
your mailing list subscription are provided in >the Listserv General
Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com>Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive |
IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved -
Click
Here
