We don't use clustering at our site, but are considering it for a couple of high volume applications. Some of these applications, though, use correlation ID to match messages on two different queues.
To be more specific, a binary message is put to Q1 under syncpoint. A second message is put to Q2. The second message's correlation ID is set to the first message's message ID. Then a commit is done. The getting app gets the message from Q1, and gets the correlated message from Q2 and processes them. This works fine.
But this design requires that both messages have to be delivered to the same target queue manager. How can we guarantee that if we use clustering? Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
- Re: ' Clustering w/ Message Affinity Jim Ford
- Re: ' Clustering w/ Message Affinity TonyPsaltis
- Re: Clustering w/ Message Affinity Potkay, Peter M (ISD, IT)
- Re: Clustering w/ Message Affinity Jim Ford
- Re: Clustering w/ Message Affinity Potkay, Peter M (ISD, IT)
- Re: Clustering w/ Message Affinity Jim Ford
- Re: Clustering w/ Message Affinity Neil Casey
- Re: Clustering w/ Message Affinity Tim Armstrong
- Re: Clustering w/ Message Affinity Jim Ford
- Re: Clustering w/ Message Affinity Neil Casey
- Re: Clustering w/ Message Affin... Jim Ford
