My boss is not Bill Gates, but he still wants to downsize the sun machines to Intel and as for wanting the Corvette well I want the Ferrari!!!
You don't need to tell me about J2EE being better I know that for sure, but we have a lot of .NET code that will need to work with other platforms and I was hoping for a better way of doing it! As for money, J2EE programmers cost 2 to 3 folds more then .NET programmers. Cheers Didi ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Lacroix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 5:25 PM Subject: Re: Implementing JMS form C# > Hi, > > So, you are in a Ford dealership wanting to buy a Mustang but saying you want > the features and color of a Corvette!?!?! > > Now maybe your boss is Bill Gates but seriously, if you want J2EE features then > why don't you just use Java? > > It can't be a cost issue. You can get almost everything for free. > - Eclipse IDE for Java developement - FREE > - Java JDK v5.0 - FREE > - Java J2EE v1.4 - FREE > - JBoss (now certified for J2EE) - FREE > - WMQ Server - pony up some money to IBM. > > > Regards, > Roger Lacroix > Capitalware Inc. > http://www.capitalware.biz > > > Quoting mqteam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Sid/Roger, > > > > > > > > The reason I want to use JMS rather then the MQ.NET API is because lets face > > it, the .NET API is far from being really object-oriented, it very much like > > coding procedural using an OO language. Now that would fine if we were > > writing VB code, but we have a lot of Java know-how and we would like to > > have the same in .NET be it design patterns and methodologies or just code > > samples for handling messages we rather recode then redesign and rethink. > > > > > > > > Just think about the added value given by using JNDI and abstraction of > > publish and subscribe to common queuing. > > > > > > > > Roger thanks for the link, but we have already have a message type we use > > that inherent the MQMessage and expands it to include the JMS headers. > > > > > > > > What we are looking for is a way to code this: > > > > > > public static void main(String[] args) { > > String destName = null; > > String destType = null; > > Context jndiContext = null; > > ConnectionFactory connectionFactory = null; > > Connection connection = null; > > Session session = null; > > Destination dest = null; > > MessageConsumer consumer = null; > > TextMessage message = null; > > > > connectionFactory = (ConnectionFactory) > > jndiContext.lookup("jms/QueueConnectionFactory"); > > connection = connectionFactory.createConnection(); > > session = connection.createSession(false, > > Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE); > > consumer = session.createConsumer(dest); > > connection.start(); > > > > Message m = consumer.receive(1); > > And so on > > > > Cheers > > TIA > > Didi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:59 PM > > Subject: Re: Implementing JMS form C# > > > > > > > The .net environment supports MSMQ only (AFAI), I don't think there is any > > > kind of JMS bridge built in. > > > > > > If your using c# why not use IBM .NET support ?? Why JMS ?? > > > > > > Sid > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: mqteam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, 24 November 2004 22:42 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Implementing JMS form C# > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to know if there are any JMS implementations in C#, > > > > > > Meaning can I write code like this in C#: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using XXX.JMS > > > > > > > > > > > > Namespace mynamespace { > > > > > > > > > > > > Class myclass { > > > > > > > > > > > > Void static main .. > > > > > > > > > > > > ConnectionFactory qcf; > > > > > > Connection Conn; > > > > > > Session Sess ; > > > > > > > > > > > > Conn = qcf.createconnection() .. > > > > > > > > > > > > And so on and so forth, > > > > > > Do you know of any product like this, better yet an open source is better. > > > > > > Best option will include an MDB and support for MQSeries built in, but > > this > > > is a little to much to expect. > > > > > > > > > > > > The reason I need it is to form a common methodology on messaging from > > .NET > > > and J2EE. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Didi > > > > > > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in > > > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com > > > Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive > > > > > > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in > > > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com > > > Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive > > > > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in > > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com > > Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive > > > > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com > Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
