Tobias Oetiker wrote:

> I do agree that other parts of rrdtool can and will profit from
> having the data massaging facilities available in a module separate
> from rrdtool graph, but at the same moment I do not see why this
> would require rrdtool graph and a potential rrdtool report to be
> removed from the main body of the application ...
> 
I think what would be useful is to be able to feed the graphing part
with variety of datasources, instead of just the builtin file format.

Pete

--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help        mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi

Reply via email to