--- Jake Brutlag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > As far as I understand (CVSWeb would be nice...), that's because of > > the latest Jake's changes. > > As I noted in my last message re: versions, when I implemented version > 2, I modified create so that version 1 files were still created UNLESS > version 2 features were specifically requested (computed data sources, > holt-winters RRAs). When Sasha implemented version 3, he kept the
sorry Jake, I didn't follow the last posts thoroughly. Your name was the first in my mind when talking about RRD versions... By the way, this was a good example of (valid) RRD data that could block the grapher. Perhaps those near-limit numbers with too low exponents need better treatment: let's say alpha is the smallest positive double that is not null, and H is the graph height, or some other characteristic number, then the numbers between 0+(alpha*H) and 0-(alpha*H) should be treated as zero. Cheers, Stan -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
