xml as intermediate-format is what i was thinking of at first. but it has a severe drawback. xml-files are getting really big with some rrds (in our case about 50MB), so processing those files is very time- and memory-consuming. i think that 'add' and 'delete' would be easy to implement, as well as joining rrds, having the same RRAs and step. but i dont see the need for this, since you can generate graphs from multiple rrds. so, in my opinion, a single rrd for each ds is all you need. but i'm not using all features of rrdtool, especially CDEF, so maybe i miss the point.
hp ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stanislav Sinyagin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hans-Peter Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 2:04 AM Subject: Re: [rrd-developers] Re: rrdsplit and perl 5.8 module for windows > > --- Hans-Peter Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > what did you mean then? > > a luxury solution, nothing less: > http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers/msg01254.html > -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
