On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 02:13:57PM -0800, James Kingston wrote:
> I tracked it down to the reduce_data function, where the leftovers at
> each end of the time range, after the data reduction, were being
> discarded by converting them to NaN.
Are you saying you found the following to be incorrect:
/* If we had to alter the endtime, there won't be
** enough data to fill the last row. This means
** we have to skip some rows at the end
*/
or is it just a matter of garbage in results in garbage out?
What happens if you set end_time to a whole multiple of
steps times step ? (and don't use this new parameter)
Alex
--
I ask you to respect any "Reply-To" and "Mail-Follow-Up" headers. If
you reply to me off-list, you'd better tell me you're doing so. If
you don't, and if I reply to the list, that's your problem, not mine.
--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
