Lorenzo Colitti writes: > Rafael Martinez Torres wrote: >>>> The problem is that we have to work around a bug in the Debian INET6 >>>> module. Specifically, if you call IO::Socket::INET6->new() without >>>> specifying a remote address, INET6.pm will create an IPv4 socket, and >>>> IPv6 won't work. >> >> Then ( and only then ) this will be bug on INET6.pm
> Yes, it is a bug in INET6.pm (the Debian version). >>>> The workaround for this bug is to specify the host and port in the >>>> IO::Socket::INET6->new() call. But this causes the "reply from different >>>> IPv6 address doesn't work" problem. So you can't just use a different >>>> INET6, you have to modify both INET6 and SNMP_Session. >> >> Did you ckeck my INET6.pm then ? If mine is sucessfull, then it would be >> easier to use the correct one than hacking the SNMP_Session. > If we use your INET6.pm, we have to change SNMP_Session.pm as well. See my last message for a version of SNMP_Session.pm that works (well) with Rafael's INET6.pm (1.26/1.90). -- Simon. -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg-developers
