Yes I agree On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Jim Donofrio <[email protected]> wrote: > http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html > > They can still use hadoop 0.20 with the 1.0 artifact because we are > producing the exact same jar with either dependency. If you look in the > chart on that page, if someone lists mrunit as a test dependency, our > provided hadoop dependency is not included. The user is then free to use > whatever hadoop version they want. If they use 0.23 they will a runtime > exception related to the interface/class Context object issue. If they > provided either hadoop 1.0 or 0.20 mrunit for 1.0 will work. > > > On 04/04/2012 10:34 PM, Brock Noland wrote: >> >> I agree on all accounts. The person who helped me setup the profiles >> setup three so I kept it at that. I figured there might be some people >> still looking for an 0.20 artifact but 1.0 has been out long enough. >> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Jim Donofrio<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Why did we make a separate profile for hadoop 1.0.0, that jar is exactly >>> the >>> same as the one for 0.20? Since hadoop is changing hadoop 0.23 to 2.0, >>> maybe >>> it would be better to have only 2 jar's, one would be hadoop1 and the >>> other >>> hadoop2? >>> >> >> >
-- Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/
