Wouldn't it be possible to have the test machine generate the ref. image itself, for instance the first time a (new) visual test is run?
This would solve any enviro discrepancy (in addition to differences in rendering, for instance a small difference in fonts used or in anti-aliasing or any other detail, may generate a false positive). Also, a 1-pixel difference -- which seems to cover the majority of differences in the example test run -- may be rather irrelevant. Any change to make the test (a little bit) more tolerant? Ultimately, a visual test makes sense for differences which are *visible*: I think my eye is not untrained, but I could not spot any *real* difference between the reference in the test images and the sample test run. M. -- View this message in context: http://dev-list.musescore.org/Visual-test-suite-tp7578380p7578382.html Sent from the MuseScore Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mscore-developer mailing list Mscore-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
