works
thanks

Je la 09/06/2015 14:52, Lasconic skribis :
Add

git checkout 2.0.2

before
git reset --hard HEAD
git pull

lasconic


2015-06-07 14:38 GMT+02:00 Robert Leleu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

    D'accord pour compiler 2.0.2
    Je joins mon script.....je ne comprends pas comment le moidfier
    pour récupérer la 2.0.2
    Robert Leleu


    Je la 06/06/2015 23:54, Lasconic skribis :
    I created the 2.0.2 branch but I changed my plan a bit. I was
    going to cherry pick the vast majority of the commits of master
    so I figured out it was be better to branch master and remove
    what we didn't want. So here is what I did.

    1/ I created 2.0.2 branch based on master
    2/ I talked with Werner and on IRC, I talked with Marc, Jojo, to
    find out the changes we did that would make files created in
    2.0.2 not look right in MuseScore 2.0 and 2.0.1. We found a
    couple of things
    * storage of irregular measure and breakMMRest property in
    measure is done differently in master
    * Master uses the new met* symbol from the last version of
    bravura in tempo texts. 2.0 and 2.0.1 don't have this symbol.
    3/ I made changes in the 2.0.2 branch to solve these two
    problems. If you can think of anything else, or if you find a
    file made in nightlies that don't open correctly in 2.0/2.0.1,
    please report.
    4/ I changed the version to 2.0.2 in the code.

    Starting from today, nightlies on Mac and nightlies on Windows
    are built from the 2.0.2 branch. It would be great if Linux
    nightlies could use this branch too.

    Regarding translations, I reactivated the push to Transifex and I
    removed the -noobsolete flag when calling lupdate. Transifex
    should get the strings added in the 2.0.2 branch and keep deleted
    strings. However we might have deleted some strings between 2.0
    and 2.0.1...
    The process in charge of getting strings from transifex and store
    them for the resource manager has also been updated and now store
    the strings in two folders, one for 2.0.1 and one for 2.0.2.
    Since we could have removed strings for 2.0 I didn't do anything
    yet, so 2.0 will not receive translations updates for now.

    Leon, the 2.0.2 branch is based on master. So the pull parser is
    on by default.

    The addition of this branch doesn't change the development
    process. The master branch is still the reference, we should use
    it to make PR. I will monitor the commits and cherry pick them in
    the 2.0.2 branch until the release. The goal is still end of
    june, beginning of July.

    lasconic

    2015-05-29 7:13 GMT+02:00 Leon Vinken <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>:

        Indeed, my preference would be to switch over to the pull
        parser by default
        a.s.a.p., to get broader test coverage. I have done all the
        testing I could
        think of, now I need additional testers to find the corner
        cases I forgot.

        Regards, Leon.



        --
        View this message in context:
        
http://dev-list.musescore.org/Preparing-MuseScore-2-0-2-tp7579373p7579431.html
        Sent from the MuseScore Developer mailing list archive at
        Nabble.com.

        
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        _______________________________________________
        Mscore-developer mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer




    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    Mscore-developer mailing list
    [email protected]  
<mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    Mscore-developer mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

Reply via email to