On Wednesday 05 October 2011 17.26:01 wahono sri wrote:
> What about Repaz, which sample of copyright should I use? Repaz core is
> from msereport and I have modify it too much.
>
msereport (and all in lib/common) is LGPL with static linking exception:
"
{ MSEgui Copyright (c) 1999-2011 by Martin Schreiber
See the file COPYING.MSE, included in this distribution,
for details about the copyright.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Modified <thedate> by <your name>
}
"
> And for CompDesigner, which copyright? I modify it from MSEide.
>
MSEide is GPL
"
{ MSEide Copyright (c) 1999-2011 by Martin Schreiber
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Modified <thedate> by <your name>
}
"
> I don't understand clearly about open source licence.
>
Me neither. ;-)
Martin
_______________________________________________
MSEide-MSEgui-talk mailing list
MSEide-MSEgui-talk@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
