There is no compelling reason not to mix that I am aware of, in small numbers.

The concern is - that Unix/Linux is monitored agentlessly (as the workflows run 
on the management server or gateway proxy watcher) and communicate to the 
provider agent on the Unix/Linux machine.  This causes significant processor 
utilization of a management server or GW.  This is why there is a scalability 
limit of how many of these workflows a single healthservice can handle.  The 
management server healthservice can handle more, because it will write directly 
to the databases.  A GW has to queue the data, send to an upstream management 
server, for insertion into the DB.  This is why management servers as a general 
rule will always handle agentless tasks better, such as network, url, or 
unix/linux.

The agent traffic will be handled by the healthservice on the GW as well, and 
be processed via the same queue.   The load of 60ish windows server agents 
through a gateway is almost negligible.  As long as your gateway can adequately 
handle the load of the unix/linux, then the windows agents reporting to the 
same healthservice should be insignificant.





From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Pete Hakesley
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 10:09 AM
To: 'msmom ([email protected])'
Subject: [msmom] Linux and Windows on a single Gateway

All,

We have  customer who for internal reasons wants only to use a single gateway 
for 49 Linux Red Hat 4/5 and 60ish Windows 2003/2008 Servers.

All documentation says 100 Linux per dedicated GW etc. but is there a 
compelling reason technical or otherwise to never mix Linux and Windows on a 
single gateway in fairly small numbers.

Note: SCOM 2007 R2 CU4

GW Spec 2 x CPU (vCP) 6GB RAM and 40GB C: Drive 1GB Ethernet.


Peter Hakesley PJH2711-RIPE, CDCT, MBCS

SCC Services

Data Centre Operations - Service Implementation - Enterprise Systems Engineer

SCC Cole Valley 1,
20 Westwood Avenue,
Tyseley,
BIRMINGHAM B11 3RZ

Tel: +44 (0)845 351 0680 xtn 4006
eMail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Web : www.scc.com<http://www.scc.com/>

[Description: Description: BCS_Logo]




<<inline: image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to