That's useful information.

I expect a not so large DB, all VMs (resources assigned as required), not
sure about IO of the disks though (SAN).

It would be one filegroup with max files of eight, parallel processing
shouldn't go over 8 anyway and one core per file is the plan.

 

I tend to not do it though.

 

Thanks, roland

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Kevin Holman
Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2014 17:40
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [msmom] PreCreate DB's?

 

This is common for the TempDB.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175527(v=SQL.105).aspx

 

However for the OpsDB, it is arguable, and there isn't a standard that fits
across the board.  It comes down to some significant SQL tuning, and will be
dependent on a LOT of factors, primarily things like how many CPU's are
present, is the SQL server virtualized or not, is the VM tuned for NUMA
topology, is MAXDOP tuned appropriately, etc.  I have had customers split
these DB's into multiple files, and had many who didn't.  I cannot say we
always saw a major performance gain either way.

 

It is supported to take an OpsMgr DB and split into multiple files in the
PRIMARY filegroup only.  We do not support splitting the DB into multiple
filegroups.

 

 

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 5:03 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [msmom] PreCreate DB's?

 

Hey,

 

In ConfigMgr it is supported and may even be recommended to create the DB in
advance to e.g. use several files (max. 8) for parallel processing.

Is that recommend, supported  or even useful for OpsMgr?

 

-Roland

 

 

 



Reply via email to