I limit the memory SQL can grab anyway, always good practice, but I guess I use the MS then.
Using both MS only makes sense when using a load balancer right? -Roland From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kevin Holman Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2014 18:23 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [msmom] Web Console hosted where I'd install the web console locally on one or both management servers. The IIS load is not significant, and there are benefits for authentication when the web console is installed on a MS. I would NOT install IIS on a SQL server, as SQL really likes to consume all available memory and you'd be required to limit the amount available to SQL when co-hosting applications like this. From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Janus Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 10:58 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [msmom] Web Console hosted where I'm new to OpsMgr and so far I plan to do this: 2 MS (only windows systems, maybe 500, no network monitoring yet) Ops-DB and DW on separate boxes. That makes 4. All VMs. Where should I put the web console? Adding IIS and the additional load is what worries me. It's using the DW as source affair, so is the DW server the best choice? -Roland
