> > The floating code seems to have been written from scratch. Why wasn't > TI's package used as a starting point?
TI code is extremely difficult to read (for me ;). This is not optimal and full of redudant calls, etc. I did not have a TI code by the time I was writing fp support. FP is supported by GCC but not optimal. The libm provided with libc has basic FP functions implemented and float sqrt(float) is written as well. > > Is adding trig functions just a matter of building the code from other > GCC implementations, or am I missing some complexity (licensing issues, > perhaps)? There are no functs implemented in gcc. The particular FP function implementation strongly depends on the cpu architecture (besides, gcc has built-in code for some fp functions like sin, cos, sqrt, and even fft!) So, it is not a problem to writ eimplementation fron them right away in C. But this is slightly difficult to make them optimized. Well, it takes time. If you can do it, we'll appreciate this :) > > Regards, > Steve > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Mspgcc-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users -- ********************************************************************* ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ (\ Dimmy the Wild UA1ACZ `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) Enterprise Information Sys (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' Nevsky prospekt, 20 / 44 _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' Saint Petersburg, Russia (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-' +7 (812) 314-8860, 5585314 *********************************************************************
