Well,
Ok, I see, the incorrect usage of asm statement gives you some (I sill cannot
understand why) tricks.
Just do not write incorrect things.
~d
On Saturday 04 January 2003 00:50, Mark Stokes wrote:
> Yes, this is a listing from the following command line:
> msp430-objdump -DS %1.elf > %1.lst
> Where %1 is the c source filename (w/o extension).
> I was unaware of the (&total+1) assignment. The question I have is
> then, if this is how that statement works, then why does it affect the
> first assignment, and not the asm statement when it occurs after both?
> What I'm trying to ask is, the asm statement references the correct RAM
> location. The += statement does not. And. The last asm (the one w/
> the (&total+1) in it) is located after both other statements (therefore
> supposedly not affecting either of the other two statements?)
>
> Thanks again.
> -Mark
--
*********************************************************************
("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ (\ Dimmy the Wild UA1ACZ
`6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) Enterprise Information Sys
(_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' Nevsky prospekt, 20 / 44
_..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' Saint Petersburg, Russia
(il),-'' (li),' ((!.-' +7 (812) 314-8860, 5585314
*********************************************************************
