Hi Dmitry,
Matthew didn't describe the problem with the 437 accurately. When you
use -mmcu=msp430x437 the code compiles, but the following assembly step
fails. GCC knows about the 437. It is binutils that does not.
Look at my patches. One is for binutils, to added the 437. The others
patch GCC to fix some problems I found while looking for why the 437
would not work. These are places where hardware multiply is used instead
of software multiply, or vice versa.
Regards,
Steve
Dmitry wrote:
Steve,
thats all I got.
It seems that everything is there.
check md5 of msp430.c:
11c3f61a91368d04f4f8bf1357bfbcf3
~d
Known MCU names:
msp1
msp2
msp430x1101
msp430x1111
msp430x1121
msp430x1122
msp430x1132
msp430x110
msp430x112
msp430x122
msp430x1222
msp430x123
msp430x1232
msp430x133
msp430x1331
msp430x135
msp430x1351
msp430x147
msp430x148
msp430x149
msp430x167
msp430x168
msp430x169
msp430x155
msp430x156
msp430x157
msp430x412
msp430x413
msp430x311
msp430x312
msp430x313
msp430x314
msp430x315
msp430x323
msp430x325
msp430x336
msp430x337
msp430x435
msp430x436
msp430x437
msp430x447
msp430x448
msp430x449
On Thursday 06 February 2003 17:15, Steve Underwood wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
The 437 is not entirely there! :-)
In fact, I found a group of related errors in binutils and GCC. I think
the following diffs should fix several things related to the 15x, 437
and 447.
Regards,
Steve
Dmitry wrote:
this is there.
which compiler version are you using?
~d
On Thursday 06 February 2003 04:47, [email protected] wrote:
Has anyone ever tried using the compiler with the MSP430F437 yet ? I
notice that it doesn't appear in the -mmcu listing. I am trying to use
this device for a new project, I started using the F436 but now have over
24k of code. I have moved over to the F447 and disabled the hardware
multiplier, this also appears to be working. Can anyone tell me if the
xxxF437 likely to be added soon ?
Cheers
Matthew
