If you'll tell me exactly what I need for that, and if we can be
reasonably
assured that it won't break from release to release, I'm all for it. I use
the binutils-2.11 because, well... the web page said to. I'm not sure, but
I think you and Dmitry are the only two that have this stuff memorized.
Hopefully, you'll not be stepping off any curbs into oncoming trucks.
Is there a stable tag to pull from, so we're not getting the Best of
Redhat
every week? This is important to me, as a MSP430 developer. I've only
recently started getting the nerve to try the new releases, since it
requires revalidating all my applications. There were lots of CVS checkins
flying by in the past few months, in relation to the move to GCC 3.2. The
version I have is stable (3.0), and I can usually plan on any errors being
my programming, rather the compiler/libraries.
Thoughts?
--John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]on Behalf Of Steve
> Underwood
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 18:04
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] Installing the msp430 gcc compiler
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The packaging module in CVS contains the build files for the Windows
> installer I produced. It contains a .spec file for an RPM for
> binutils.
> I'm trying to get around to making .spec files for the other parts of
> mspgcc. Your script seems like a sensible addition to that area. One
> thing, though. The binutils-2.11 stuff is out of date. You should be
> using a recent snapshot of binutils from sources.redhat.com.
> These have
> the MSP430 stuff integrated now, and there are bug fixes in
> there which
> are missing from the binutils-2.11 in the mspgcc CVS. The CVS
> stuff is
> no longer updated. We should probably add something to CVS to
> mark it as
> obsolete.
>
> Someone really needs the time to revise the build information
> on the web
> site.
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
>
> J.C.Wren wrote:
>
> > You are correct. And the error doesn't (shouldn't?)
> really show up unless
> >you have an old build laying around that needs the rm'ing,
> which is why I
> >missed that. It's welcome to be posted. If so, I'd like to
> add a 'written
> >by' with my email address. The copyright part I don't care about.
> >
> > --John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Rick Jenkins [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 17:39
> >>To: J.C.Wren; [email protected]
> >>Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] Installing the msp430 gcc compiler
> >>
> >>
> >>Thanks. This works really well, and even points out where I
> >>was going wrong
> >>(as I suspected, wrong source). One working script is worth
> >>any amount of
> >>instructions.
> >>
> >>There is a small bug in the script at line 81, which reads:
> >>
> >>\rm-rf gcc-3.2.2
> >>
> >>missing a space, should be
> >>
> >>\rm -rf gcc-3.2.2
> >>
> >>I don't know if this is in the original, or a transmission glitch.
> >>
> >>This should, with the author's permission, be put up on the
> >>site; it will save
> >>newbies a lot of time.
> >>
> >>Thanks again for a great script,
> >>rick
> >>
> >>On March 29, 2003 21:56, you wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> This is a script I wrote for a friend of mine...
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
> NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
> _______________________________________________
> Mspgcc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
