Ok, that's where I meant for it to be, cool.
-Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve
Underwood
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 11:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] Added support for XT2 on 44x


Chris Liechti wrote:

> Mark Stokes wrote:
>
>> Found one more thing to add to the system_clock.h file.  There is a
flag
>> used on the FLL_CTL0 register to determine if the XT2 oscillator is
>> faulting.  Add this line after line 81 in system_clock.h:
>> #define XT2OF               0x08            /* XT2 Oscillator Fault
Flag
>> */
>
>
> ok, done. 

To make things a little more pedantic, I just changed it. :-)

I made the definition of XT2OF conditional on the definition of 
__msp430_have_fll_and_xt2, since it shouldn't really be defined for 
chips without and xtal2.

I just had another scan of the the header to look for other omissions 
like this, but didn't find any. Of course, that doesn't mean there are 
none :-)

Regards,
Steve




-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com

_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users


Reply via email to