Thanks again! -----Mensaje original----- De: Steve Underwood [mailto:[email protected]] Enviado el: Lunes, 30 de Junio de 2003 01:23 p.m. Para: [email protected] Asunto: Re: [Mspgcc-users] Re: Linker question.
Hi Claudio, The uninitialised option was added at my request. The problem I had was I declared an array to be filled in later at calibration time. However, the initialisation behaviour wrote zeroes all over it. That would mean doing a flash erase before it can be used, which is messy. Leaving the erase area uninitialised seemed the appropriate way to handle this, and is like the behaviour of other MSP430 tools. Regards, Steve Claudio Grasso wrote: > I see. (It's a kind of "initialised later" rather than unitialised. :-) ) > > Thanks. > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Enviado el: Lunes, 30 de Junio de 2003 12:52 p.m. > Para: [email protected] > Asunto: [Mspgcc-users] Re: Linker question. > > Claudio Grasso <[email protected]> writes: > > > ¿In which case you use uninitialized data in ROM? I can't figure out > > situations when to use such feature. > > You could initialise/store the actual data with an external tool > (e.g. in production) via the JTAG or BSL interfaces. > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
