At 19:38 10-08-05 +0200, you wrote: >N. Coesel wrote : > >> Just a thought that pops into my mind: Is "long long int" a valid type? If >> >>you want a 64 bit number, the proper type is "long long". I would not rely >>on the "int" type since the size of it depends on the architecture. >> >> >long long >signed long long >long long int >signed long long int > >all design the same type (whose size is implementation-dependent).
No, a long is always 32 bit and a long long is always 64 bit; both are implementation independant. Anyway, I have used the long long type on MSP430 without any problems. Nico Coesel
