On 2006-03-24, Recoskie, Chris <[email protected]> wrote:
> We already had compiler technology for other instruction set
> architectures that we reused. I don't think this is really
> the appropriate place to get into a pitch about why we think
> our compiler is better than someone else's but I'll just say
> that we have a lot of features that we feel are compelling.
Features like "forces you to use MS Windows". ;)
> I can't really comment as to that as that's all handled by the
> MSP430 team and I really don't have anything to do with the
> support of the MSPGCC project. I'm just a lowly tools
> engineer :-P
And we're just lowly customers. :(
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! My mind is a potato
at field...
visi.com
