Dmitry wrote: > Looks like this is 3.3.X compiler problem. > Use 3.2 version of gcc.
I'll try using 3.2 when I can. Any idea why this is broken in 3.3.X? Is it horribly complex to fix? Rob Spanton
Dmitry wrote: > Looks like this is 3.3.X compiler problem. > Use 3.2 version of gcc.
I'll try using 3.2 when I can. Any idea why this is broken in 3.3.X? Is it horribly complex to fix? Rob Spanton